As AI does more of the hands-on work, the hope is that experts still make the judgment calls, meaning the decisions with more than one defensible answer. We tested this with 50 professional analysts who did a statistical analysis with Claude Code. On each key decision, we randomly assigned which of two defensible options the agent would favor. Analysts mostly went with the agent’s side, and few named the agent as a reason afterward.
How AI agents shape experts’ judgment calls
Source:Anthropic Research Blog ↗