Comparison of Equivalent Cloud Services

Comparison of Equivalent Cloud Services Across AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure

When you move between AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure, the hardest part is often translation: each platform has an equivalent for almost everything, but the names share nothing. This is a working reference that maps the commonly-used services across the three clouds, category by category, so you can find the counterpart you already know.

Databases

ServiceAWSGoogle CloudAzure
Managed relationalRDS (MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server)Cloud SQLAzure SQL Database
Advanced / scale-out relationalAuroraSpanner (global, strongly consistent)SQL Managed Instance
NoSQLDynamoDB (key-value, document)Firestore (document)Cosmos DB (multi-model, global)
Data warehouseRedshiftBigQuery (serverless)Synapse Analytics

Compute

ServiceAWSGoogle CloudAzure
Virtual machinesEC2Compute EngineVirtual Machines
Serverless functionsLambdaCloud FunctionsAzure Functions
Managed KubernetesEKS (+ Fargate)GKEAKS

Storage

ServiceAWSGoogle CloudAzure
Object storageS3Cloud StorageBlob Storage
Block storageEBSPersistent DiskDisk Storage
File storageEFSFilestoreAzure Files

Data and analytics pipelines

ServiceAWSGoogle CloudAzure
ETLGlueDataflow (batch + stream)Data Factory
Stream / messagingKinesisPub/SubEvent Hubs
Big data (Hadoop/Spark)EMRDataprocHDInsight

AI and machine learning

ServiceAWSGoogle CloudAzure
ML platformSageMakerVertex AIAzure ML
Pre-trained AI APIsRekognition, PollyVision, NLP, Translation APIsCognitive Services

Networking

ServiceAWSGoogle CloudAzure
Private networkVPCVPC (global)VNet
Load balancingElastic Load BalancerCloud Load BalancerLoad Balancer
CDNCloudFrontCloud CDNAzure CDN

Where each platform leans

The services line up closely enough that the decision rarely turns on feature gaps. AWS has the broadest catalog and the deepest integrations between services. Google Cloud's strengths concentrate in analytics and AI/ML - BigQuery and Vertex AI are frequent reasons teams pick it. Azure is the natural fit where an organization already runs on Microsoft tooling, with tight Active Directory and Office integration. The practical rule is to choose for your existing ecosystem, workload shape, and team expertise, not for a marginal feature one provider has this quarter.

Comments (1)

  1. smortergiremal
    Hello! I could have sworn I’ve been to this blog before but after browsing through some of the post I realized it’s new to me. Anyways, I’m definitely happy I found it and I’ll be book-marking and checking back frequently!

Leave a Comment